Clarification needed on clarification

[ Update: David Wilkins has just published an article W(h)ither language, culture and education in remote Indigenous communities of the Northern Territory? in the Australian Review of Public Affairs (October 2008) on the topic which is well worth the read as it covers some of the research into bilingualism, bilingual education and the cognitive advantages. Essential reading for people who want to base policies on evidence.]
Previous posts (here, here, and here) discussed the likely bad effects of the NT Minister of Education’s proposal for Indigenous children to be taught English for the first four hours of every school day.
The Minister has now clarified this in Parliament. It’s rather carefully worded, and doesn’t mention the four hours proposal. It gives qualified support for Indigenous languages.

“Our schools will still be able to undertake Indigenous language and cultural programs and I emphasise strongly here that I am not removing the resources from our two-way schools. There will continue to be Indigenous teacher assistants working in partnership with the teachers in those classrooms in our very remote schools.”

This is welcome, but it needs further clarification. Not “removing the resources” doesn’t preclude “diverting the resources”. An Indigenous teacher assistant could spend a lot of time photocopying English lesson plans, and no time explaining class material in an Indigenous language to children who don’t understand English.

3 thoughts on “Clarification needed on clarification”

  1. In the end I think it is all largely rhetoric. She makes a number of comments along these lines:
    “There will be a continued support for the development of resources to teach language and culture, but there has to be a greater emphasis on English.”
    Really – apart from the few two-way schools – all schools are English-only with no Language and Culture program at all. In this respect, there is no way you could increase the English content except to not have an ILC program.
    She also encourages communities to continue teaching children language and culture which misses the point that mainstream education uses 6 or more hours of their children’s time a day. And in the case of high school, actually takes all of their time except holidays.
    What many communities are asking for is a slice of that time back.
    Some welcome suggestions from DET though:
    1. Teachers doing Culture Awareness courses
    2. Teachers being trained in ESL

  2. I am interested in outcome for beginning of school 2009, would you be able to provide any further information or leads?

Here at Endangered Languages and Cultures, we fully welcome your opinion, questions and comments on any post, and all posts will have an active comments form. However if you have never commented before, your comment may take some time before it is approved. Subsequent comments from you should appear immediately.

We will not edit any comments unless asked to, or unless there have been html coding errors, broken links, or formatting errors. We still reserve the right to censor any comment that the administrators deem to be unnecessarily derogatory or offensive, libellous or unhelpful, and we have an active spam filter that may reject your comment if it contains too many links or otherwise fits the description of spam. If this happens erroneously, email the author of the post and let them know. And note that given the huge amount of spam that all WordPress blogs receive on a daily basis (hundreds) it is not possible to sift through them all and find the ham.

In addition to the above, we ask that you please observe the Gricean maxims:

*Be relevant: That is, stay reasonably on topic.

*Be truthful: This goes without saying; don’t give us any nonsense.

*Be concise: Say as much as you need to without being unnecessarily long-winded.

*Be perspicuous: This last one needs no explanation.

We permit comments and trackbacks on our articles. Anyone may comment. Comments are subject to moderation, filtering, spell checking, editing, and removal without cause or justification.

All comments are reviewed by comment spamming software and by the site administrators and may be removed without cause at any time. All information provided is volunteered by you. Any website address provided in the URL will be linked to from your name, if you wish to include such information. We do not collect and save information provided when commenting such as email address and will not use this information except where indicated. This site and its representatives will not be held responsible for errors in any comment submissions.

Again, we repeat: We reserve all rights of refusal and deletion of any and all comments and trackbacks.

Leave a Comment