Deserts need people: Environment Blog Action Day

The deserts of Australia are filling up with pest animals, camels, donkeys, horses. Like a plague of giant rabbits, the camels are eating out the mulga, the bean trees and trashing the waterholes. Here’s Susan(na) Nakamarra’s Nelson’s painting of her country, Ngapakunypa, north-west of Tennant Creek.
Susan Nakamarra Nelson, “Wild animals”, Julalikari Arts [1], Tennant Creek 2007.
Picture in private collection.

These days, wildernesses can’t stay pristine without some help – stopping the advance of cane toads, starlings, feral weeds, European carp…, managing fires, monitoring threatened species. It’s really about occupying the country. Deserts need people.
And people need money. No one in Australia today can survive outside the money economy – if they don’t have a job or are not on welfare, then they’ll rely on family members who do, or beg or steal. So, how to get money is a large problem for Indigenous people living in remote areas like the deserts of Central Australia and the tropical scrub of Arnhem Land and the Kimberly.
One potential source of jobs is in the Indigenous ranger programmes. Potentially, these could involve remote communities with younger people doing the physical work, and older people passing on their knowledge of the natural history of the area (Traditional/Indigenous Ecological Knowledge). Involving local communities who have a longterm relationship with the country concerned is a lot cheaper than bringing in outsiders, training them up, and helping them adjust to life out bush. Life in remote communities is becoming more environmentally friendly as solar technology is cutting down on the use of diesel generators.

Here’s an array at a remote community of about 700 people, which is said to supply about half the community’s daytime power needs.
At the moment, funding for the Indigenous ranger programs relies on tax-payers and the Government understanding the importance of this work, and the cost-effectiveness of employing Indigenous people to do it. The benefits are long-term, but require long-term funding, which is something Governments hate.
It’s important that the programs are effective – otherwise the tax-payers will jack up and not fund them. In an ideal world, young people would start ranger training knowing that there is long-term commitment to the work, and to proper funding of the work. Their training would be staged, so they weren’t repeating the same old same old. They’d be trained by teams of older people with Indigenous ecological knowledge and skills, and scientists. Indigenous languages would be at the heart of the work. This would be great, as many younger people are not learning their languages and the Indigenous ecological knowledge which goes with the classifications and labelling imposed by a language.
In an ideal world.
Australia’s at a turning point however. The Government wants Indigenous people to move out of remote communities. They’d prefer rangers to work from big towns, and occasionally drive something like 400 kilometres to do some burning, rather than live in a small community and do it on a more regular basis.
To get Indigenous people to decide to move, the Government’s engaging in “focal resource management”. And so they’re fencing off the money waterhole (no work-for-the-dole on small remote communities, no CDEP). They’re putting little baits of money (mobility allowance for moving to areas with jobs). And they’ve set up trap-yards to prevent people going back to remote communities (no welfare for 6-8 weeks if you go back to an area with no jobs).
Ironically, this is happening just as other Government members are urging for the population of the north on climate change grounds.

Julalikari Arts, like many other Aboriginal arts groups, will suffer from the closure of CDEP – see a position paper here [.pdf]

1 thought on “Deserts need people: Environment Blog Action Day”

  1. About a year or so ago, Alison Anderson was pleading for seed money to establish a camel abattoir at Kaltukatjara(Docker R.)claimed she had plenty of evidence that it could be viable.
    I heard Brough the other day musing about spending money on a study into the viability of a mobile camel abattoir. ‘Course that doesn’t mean it will get built or set up, just that some fat cat accounting firm will get to make a tidy little earner out of it. Do we really deserve this sort of government?

Here at Endangered Languages and Cultures, we fully welcome your opinion, questions and comments on any post, and all posts will have an active comments form. However if you have never commented before, your comment may take some time before it is approved. Subsequent comments from you should appear immediately.

We will not edit any comments unless asked to, or unless there have been html coding errors, broken links, or formatting errors. We still reserve the right to censor any comment that the administrators deem to be unnecessarily derogatory or offensive, libellous or unhelpful, and we have an active spam filter that may reject your comment if it contains too many links or otherwise fits the description of spam. If this happens erroneously, email the author of the post and let them know. And note that given the huge amount of spam that all WordPress blogs receive on a daily basis (hundreds) it is not possible to sift through them all and find the ham.

In addition to the above, we ask that you please observe the Gricean maxims:

*Be relevant: That is, stay reasonably on topic.

*Be truthful: This goes without saying; don’t give us any nonsense.

*Be concise: Say as much as you need to without being unnecessarily long-winded.

*Be perspicuous: This last one needs no explanation.

We permit comments and trackbacks on our articles. Anyone may comment. Comments are subject to moderation, filtering, spell checking, editing, and removal without cause or justification.

All comments are reviewed by comment spamming software and by the site administrators and may be removed without cause at any time. All information provided is volunteered by you. Any website address provided in the URL will be linked to from your name, if you wish to include such information. We do not collect and save information provided when commenting such as email address and will not use this information except where indicated. This site and its representatives will not be held responsible for errors in any comment submissions.

Again, we repeat: We reserve all rights of refusal and deletion of any and all comments and trackbacks.

Leave a Comment