{"id":3446,"date":"2006-09-12T12:18:42","date_gmt":"2006-09-12T12:18:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.paradisec.org.au\/blog\/2006\/09\/permanence-and-accountability\/"},"modified":"2011-02-05T07:44:25","modified_gmt":"2011-02-05T07:44:25","slug":"permanence-and-accountability","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.paradisec.org.au\/blog\/2006\/09\/permanence-and-accountability\/","title":{"rendered":"Permanence and Accountability"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Jane&#8217;s last <a href=\"\/blog\/2006\/09\/transience-and-permanence-on-the-web\/\">post<\/a> and a <a href=\"http:\/\/itre.cis.upenn.edu\/~myl\/languagelog\/archives\/003565.html\">post<\/a> on the ever excellent <a href=\"http:\/\/itre.cis.upenn.edu\/~myl\/languagelog\/\">Language Log<\/a> have got me thinking about permanence and accountability in the internet age. Its a theme that I encounter again and again, working for a digital archive.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><br \/>\nFirst, Mark Liberman&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/itre.cis.upenn.edu\/~myl\/languagelog\/archives\/003565.html\">post<\/a> on Language Log was a fairly scathing breakdown, reference by reference, article by article, that showed that a point supposedly backed up by hard evidence, well, wasn&#8217;t. A great effort really. And thanks to his extensive linking, and by simply placing the relevant articles online, we too can come to much the same conclusion. Well, admittedly, I just took his word for it&#8230; but that&#8217;s all I&#8217;ve got time for over my morning coffee.<br \/>\nExciting things are happening in academia with individuals and organisations starting to fully utilise the internet. As Jane <a href=\"\/blog\/2006\/09\/transience-and-permanence-on-the-web\/\">mentions<\/a>, Sydney University is having great success with several new digital initiatives. I think DSpace is the bee&#8217;s knees! Its going to be wonderful. Its one step closer to directly linking to the actual section of the actual article which you&#8217;re interested in. That&#8217;s the kind of functionality that I&#8217;m after.<br \/>\nGreat, you say, that&#8217;ll save me 10 minutes of searching in the library. Well, yes, says I, but that&#8217;s not what&#8217;s interesting. Imagine linking directly and explicitly to the paragraphs or sentences that you are interested in. That&#8217;s heaps better than a simple article reference. Suddenly the reader can discover <i>exactly<\/i> what your talking about, quickly, and by jumping directly from one article to the next, in a way that you&#8217;re already accustomed to.<br \/>\nBut really that&#8217;s just the beginning. Think of the Altavista to Google leap. (This over simplifies it a bit but,) Altavista was a simple but vast index of content words and meta tags. Google came along with, amongst other things, the idea that links actually expressed something meaningful, and suddenly the internet became a whole lot more useful.<br \/>\nWell, imagine reading an interesting article and being able to see who quoted it. Imagine a density plot of the most popular quotes overlaid on the text of the article. What parts of a paper are people talking about the most? You could establish quotable articles and the articles that quoted the quotables and became quotable themselves. Imagine looking at quotability on a time line. You would be able to see the &#8220;hot spots&#8221; in the development of ideas over time. These would be simple additions to a modern search engine, and in fact have already be added in a rough sense. All that needs to happen (maybe that should be scare quoted) is for researchers to adopt a new referencing scheme and to archive their articles in digital repositories.<br \/>\nLeap sideways, imagine that instead of articles, we put up our raw research and\/or field work data. Not only can you link directly to the source(s) for your argument, so can others in their critique. Let them crunch the numbers if they don&#8217;t believe you. Or say you&#8217;re talking about discourse pragmatics, then people may like to hear for themselves the utterance&#8217;s intonation. Even better, say you were unable to explore an interesting avenue, this leaves it open for someone else to come along and explore. This is a critical ability to facilitate when you&#8217;re talking about endangered languages.<br \/>\nTo me this extensive referencing is a straight forward way of increasing the empirical weight that a piece of research holds. Sure, where people have already referenced articles, it already technically there, but I&#8217;m talking about granularity of referencing here. And in terms of source data, I&#8217;m talking about qualifying your statements as explicitly as possible.<br \/>\nBut, to come crashing down to reality again, this technology is not quite there yet. Well actually it kinda is there, the main problem as I see it is adoption. So first of all <a href=\"http:\/\/escholarship.usyd.edu.au\/\">get uploading!<\/a>. A good solid base of data is where this revolution will begin!<br \/>\nThese are hot topics in the Documentary Linguistics and Digital Repositories fields. There&#8217;ll be a fair bit of discussion of this at our upcoming <a href=\"http:\/\/conferences.arts.usyd.edu.au\/index.php?cf=11\">conference<\/a>, which is look&#8217;s like its going to have a great line up of interesting papers. If this kind of thing interests you, then we hope to see you there!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jane&#8217;s last post and a post on the ever excellent Language Log have got me thinking about permanence and accountability in the internet age. Its a theme that I encounter again and again, working for a digital archive.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[9,13,4,5,6,7,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3446","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-archiving","category-experience","category-fieldwork","category-linguistics","category-paradisec","category-rnld","category-technology"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.paradisec.org.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3446","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.paradisec.org.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.paradisec.org.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.paradisec.org.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.paradisec.org.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3446"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.paradisec.org.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3446\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4135,"href":"https:\/\/www.paradisec.org.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3446\/revisions\/4135"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.paradisec.org.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3446"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.paradisec.org.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3446"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.paradisec.org.au\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3446"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}